The term "Steampunk" itself came from one of these threads, as an outgrowth of the burgeoning genre of Cyberpunk. Blame or laud for the term goes to pioneer Cyberpunk author K.W. Jeter, who wrote the following letter to Locus in 1987:
Dear Locus,
Enclosed is a copy of my 1979 novel Morlock Night; I'd appreciate your being so good as to route it Faren Miller, as it's a prime piece of evidence in the great debate as to who in ‘the Powers/Blaylock/Jeter fantasy triumvirate’ was writing in the ‘gonzo-historical manner’ first. Though of course, I did find her review in the March Locus to be quite flattering.
Personally, I think Victorian fantasies are going to be the next big thing, as long as we can come up with a fitting collective term for Powers, Blaylock and myself. Something based on the appropriate technology of the era; like ‘steampunks,’ perhaps...
Michael Berry, writing for the San Francisco Chronicle in 1987, confirmed it:
Jeter, along with fellow novelists Tim Powers and James Blaylock, seems to be carving out a new sub-genre of science fiction with his new book. Whereas such authors as William Gibson, Michael Swanwick and Walter Jon Williams have explored the futuristic commingling of human being and computer in their ‘cyberpunk’ novels and stories, Jeter and his compatriots, whom he half-jokingly has dubbed ‘steampunks,’ are having a grand time creating wacko historical fantasies.
This antiquated reimagining of Cyberpunk set 100 years in the past rather than 100 years in the future had its antecedents in the works of Ronald Clark, Christopher Priest, Philip Jose Farmer and Michael Moorcock. Moorcock's 1971 The Warlord of the Air began charting the territory, followed by his sequels in the collectively titled A Nomad of the Timestreams. Harry Harrison's 1972 novel A Transatlantic Tunnel Hurrah followed suit, as did comic writer and artist Bryan Talbot with The Adventures of Luther Arkwright in 1972 (to which he returned in 1999's Heart of Empire) and a stint on Nemesis the Warlock in the mid-1980's. Philip Jose Farmer introduced his "Wold Newton Family" - a pastiche that linked a good number of Victorian and Pulp characters to a fictional meteor impact at Wold Newton - with the pseudo-biographies Tarzan Alive in 1972, Doc Savage: His Apocalyptic Life and The Other Log of Phileas Fogg both in 1973. As early as 1967, during the Atomic Age of Retro-Victorian film, historical biographer Ronald W. Clark drew many of the figures he wrote about into an alternate reality tale of a 19th century atomic bomb in Queen Victoria's Bomb.
The work for which Jeter coined the term Steampunk, and which Moorcock et. al. prefigured, was that of himself and his friends and fellow authors James Blaylock and Tim Powers. Jeter, as indicated in his letter to Locus, started it off with a Wellsian pastiche titled Morlock Night in 1979 and followed it up with Infernal Devices in 1987. Powers contributed The Anubis Gates in 1983, On Stranger Tides in 1987 and The Stress of Her Regard in 1989. Blaylock published Homunculus in 1986 and Lord Kelvin's Machine in 1992. This initial triumvate was soon followed by Paul Di Filippo's The Steampunk Trilogy, Stephen Baxter's Anti-Ice, and Diane Duane's To Visit the Queen (also about nuclear arms in the hands of the Victorian British Empire) amongst others.
Perhaps the most popular and well known of these novels also inadvertently legitimized the label Steampunk. In 1990, celebrated Cyberpunk stalwarts William Gibson and Bruce Sterling co-wrote The Difference Engine. Working more feverishly with the Cyberpunk tropes they themselves helped establish, Gibson and Sterling created a gritty mid-Victorian world in which Charles Babbage, the real-life British mathematician-engineer, was able to realize his plans of a programmable, mechanical, analog computer. The Information Age met the Steam Age as the computer revolution happened a century earlier than it did in our world, with the consequent deleterious effects on society, politics and individuals. Though Gibson exclaimed that "I'll be happy just as long as they don't label this one. There's been some dire talk of 'steampunk' but I don't think it's going to stick." the name did indeed stick. Steampunk was as official as if it had been stamped by the Queen herself.
In reviewing The Anubis Gates, Sci-Fi critic John Clute deftly noted that the inspiration for this literary Steampunk came not from Jules Verne so much as from Charles Dickens (and his later imitators), who wrote of industrialized urban London. His commentary is worth quoting at length:
There is no getting away from the man who invented steampunk. Charles Dickens (1812-1870) may not be mentioned by name anywhere in The Anubis Gates (1983), but his shaping presence can be felt everywhere in the populous chortling shadows of the London of 1810 to which the twentieth-century hero of Tim Powers's time-travel fantasy travels, never to return. It does not much matter that Powers sets his tale in a time Dickens could never have directly experienced, and of which he never wrote, because novels like Oliver Twist (1837-1839), which depicts a London not dissimilar to that explored by Brendan Doyle, are a kind of apotheosis of the supernatural melodrama popular at the beginning of the century, so that Dickins's Fagin and Powers's Horrabin share a common source in gran guignol. Similarly, the Gothic fever-dreams of such writers as Monk Lewis or Charles Maturin can be seen to underpin the oneiric inscapes of the greatest achievements of Dickens - Bleak House (1852-53) or Little Dorrit (1855-1857) or Our Mutual Friend (1864-65) - those novels in which the nightmare of London attains lasting and horrific form, though it is almost certainly the case that Eugene Sue's The Mysteries of Paris (1844) developed the "Mysteries" plot - in which the City becomes an almost animate and deeply theatrical edifice - in a more directly useful and definite manner. For Dickens, that nightmare of London may be a prophetic vision of humanity knotted into the subterranean entrails of the city machine, while for Powers the London of 1810 may be a form of nostalgia, a dream theatre for the elect to star in, buskined and immune; but at the heart of both writers' work glow the lineaments of the last world city.
Between Dickens and Powers, of course, much water has flowed down the filthy Thames. Between steampunk - a term which can be used to describe any sf novel set in any version of the previous century from which entropy has been banned as a metaphorical governor of the alternate industrial revolution of choice - and the desolate expressionism of its true founder lies what one might call Babylon-upon-Thames-punk. Fin de siecle writers like Robert Louis Stevenson, Arthur Conan Doyle, and G K Chesterton attempted to domesticate Dickens's London by transforming it into a kind of Arabian Nights themepark capable of encompassing (and taming) all the strangenesses that an Empire in pullulant decline could possibly import. Even H G Wells was sometimes capable of quasi-Dickensian sentiment (as in novels like Love and Mr. Lewisham [1900]) about the London he more normally wished utterly to destroy. That this enterprise of domestication was deeply suspect, most writers of Babylon-upon-Thames-punk knew full well, and as a result much of what they wrote gave off an air of bad-faith complacency, uneasy nostalgia, weird inanimation. It is from their doomed enterprise (and from other sources as well) that contemporary steampunk authors like K W Jeter and Powers and James Blaylock and others have borrowed not only a vision of a talismanic city, but also (it must be said) some of the complacency and diseased nostalgia of the epigones who thought to tame Dickens.
Though Clute teasingly lauded Gibson and Sterling for the "tough job" of "making London in 1855 worse than it was in fact", he and his Encyclopedia of Science Fiction co-author Peter Nicholls picked up very early on the fact that there has always been a strain of nostalgia to Steampunk. The gilded fairyland of our ancestors which Walt Disney banked on was still present beneath the layers of Dickensian soot and grime. Clute continued:
...Powers has invented a tale of paradise, where entropy lies down with the lamb and the steam yachts always run on time. In The Anubis Gates he has written a book of almost preternatural geniality, a book which it is possible (rare praise) to love. Let us all, it suggests, co-inhabit the Christmas London of Brendan Doyle, and gape like children at the pageant of the world-stage of his triumphs. We do. He is having the time of his life. We join him.
Nicholls articulated what this fantastic London signified for Steampunk authors:
...in essence Steampunk is a US phenomenon, often set in London, England, which is envisaged as at once deeply alien and intimately familiar, a kind of foreign body encysted in the US subconscious... It is as if, for a handful of sf writers, Victorian London has come to stand for one of those turning points in history where things can go one way or the other, a turning point peculiarly relevant to sf itself. It was a city of industry, science and technology where the modern world was being born, and a claustrophobic city of nightmare where the cost of this growth was registered in filth and squalor.
Tat Wood, writer for the sometimes Steampunk prefiguring TV series Doctor Who, suggested that "Americans, especially in the era of Reagan, believed time and space to be interchangeable and West = Future, hence the genuine belief of American tourists that Britain is still physically in the 19th century." London, and by extension the British Empire and the Victorian Era, was a temporal, historical and physical ground zero at which the Industrial and pre-Industrial ages met, be it in the hordes of former English rural farmers migrating to London or wealthy Londoners vacationing along the mountainous rail lines of India and Canada.
Selected Bibliography:
Clute, John. Look at the Evidence. Liverpool University Press 1996.
Clute, John and Nicholls, Peter. Encyclopedia of Science Fiction. Orbit 1999.


4 replies:
Michael Moorcock's s prominent role in the birth of Steampunk is certainly not a coincidence. In the mid-1960s Moorcock was editing the British sci-fi magazine New Worlds and intensively promoted "New Wave" - a movement that rejected traditional futuristic space sci-fi and focused on the condition of the western culture, trying more experimental writing. The New Wavers were politically aware and engage, they didn't create alternate realities just to shock or to entertain readers, but to arouse readers' reflection. For example, Moorcock, Harrison and Talbot were using post-victorian settings as vehicles for contesting British imperialism.
I believe it was the 1960s' New Wave that actually gave the green light for Steampunk. Earlier pseudo-victorian fantasies were just exotic and funny, now the doors were wide open for more serious approach. Unfortunatelly, most of the American writers haven't understood the political and social connotations of the genre. In the following decades Steampunk has been becoming less and less Dickensian and more Vernian (now it's nearly reduced to the aesthetics).
In the early 1990s "The Difference Engine" took the role of the Steampunk's flagship. But telling the truth, this association is unfortunate and misleading. "The Difference Engine" is unique - in fact it's a cyberpunk novel set in the 19th century. Almost nobody else has ever written anything like this (Grant Morrison's "Sebastian O" is an exception). If this novel was supposed to set standards for the genre, Steampunk would be an extremely short-lived and long-forgotten phenomenon.
Wow! Thank you for the added information!
I'm not as familiar with Sci-Fi writing as I'd like to be. I keep telling people I'm more of a movie guy, and when I do read Sci-Fi, it's pretty much exclusively Victorian-Edwardian. I have read Talbot's comics and can see where you're coming from with them. I tried The Difference Engine, but got about a chapter in and found it practically unreadable. I don't know how readable "Where the Mammoth Roamed" is... it's probably terrible... but I hope it's a different kind of terrible than a Victorian Cyberpunk novel.
Your comment about Steampunk being short-lived and long-forgotten is amusing since, in the next chapter, I quote from a Cyberpunk forum where they were saying that very thing. So far as they were concerned, true Steampunk was a handful of books from the 80's and 90's, and now is just Victorian fantasy.
Victorian fantasy? C'mon, these cyberpunk-centered guys must believe that steampunk is a derivative of cyberpunk (as the name suggests). But we know it's not. Gibson and Sterling have just jumped into the river which had been already flowing for decades. Jeter, Blaylock and Powers did the same, only couple of years earlier. Besides, even Jeter and his pals, who coined the name "steampunk", didn't strictly uphold the borders between the genres. So what exactly is this evolving "steampunk" thing? I also can't say that I like it's present condition, but it doesn't mean it's not steampunk anymore.
I've noticed a lot of links tracking back from the Goodreads Sci-Fi and Fantasy Book Club to this article. Welcome!
I thought I should make a comment since you seem confused over how The Anubis Gates qualifies as a "Steampunk" book and not just a weird historical fantasy. It probably helps to consider the two prevailing theories of genre.
The first is that a genre starts out as a very clear and concise idea that, over time, becomes more flexible and corrupted. The second is that a genre starts out very loose, flexible and experimental and only later coalesces into a strict and archetypal form. Personally, I think the latter makes the better argument.
In the case of The Anubis Gates, "wacko historical fantasies" were the exact thing to which K.W. Jeter applied the invented label of "Steampunk." Respected Sci-Fi critic John Clute picked that up and used Powers' novel as an example of Steampunk as Dickensian fantasy in an alternate history Industrial Revolution setting. It was only much later, within the last 2 years or so with the emergence of the Steampunk subculture, that the genre of Steampunk has coalesced into a much more limited, archetypal form.
It's only now that Steampunk has to rigidly adhere to steam-powered technology and anachronistic Punk socio-political posturing. I'd say that is at it's own loss as well... Just like eventually every Goth novel had to involve Anne Rice-style vampires, now every Steampunk novel (or outfit or laptop computer) has to be about some anarchist inventor and his messy assemblage of gears.
If not for the strictures of that rigid alternative subculture, Clute's definition of "any sf... set in any version of the previous century from which entropy has been banned as a metaphorical governor of the alternate industrial revolution of choice" would be the best, most poetic and most articulate definition of the genre around. I would still be willing to use it for any modern Scientific Romance.
Post a Comment